Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: IMO Kasparov uninvolved in decision

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 14:03:35 02/18/00

Go up one level in this thread


On February 18, 2000 at 12:14:41, blass uri wrote:

>On February 18, 2000 at 08:26:07, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On February 17, 2000 at 15:16:09, Dave Gomboc wrote:
>>
>>>On February 17, 2000 at 09:31:10, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>
>>>>On February 17, 2000 at 09:10:19, Jouni Uski wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>To continue this "tournament" is pure waste of time as Kasparov is already
>>>>>declared as winner. Why can't Adams / DJ re-played???
>>>>>
>>>>>Jouni
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I believe someone is 'afraid'.  I am not convinced it is "Adams" however.
>>>>I'll leave the rest to your imagination.
>>>
>>>Come on.  That's as ridiculous as some of the stuff people post about Deep Blue.
>>>
>>>Dave
>>
>>
>>I believe that _any_ GM would be afraid of a computer in game/X events.
>
>I think that it is dependent on X
>if X=240 minutes then I do not think they will be afraid more than they are
>afraid from 2 hours/40 moves games
>
>Uri
>


I was thinking of "reasonable X". IE all X where X <= 60, seems to be a big
advantage to the machine.




> If
>>they aren't, they are not living in reality.  I don't believe that was why
>>the match was given to Adams.  But I do believe there is "fear".
>>
>>That is based on experience and knowledge.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.