Author: Howard Exner
Date: 20:58:04 02/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 18, 2000 at 14:11:23, Côme wrote: >On February 18, 2000 at 13:38:27, Howard Exner wrote: > >>On February 18, 2000 at 12:36:28, Côme wrote: >> >>>On February 18, 2000 at 10:28:20, Howard Exner wrote: >>> >>>>Earlier you mentioned this game was played by Gusev against Auerbakh. >>>>I'm curious now how they played in this game. Could you or anyone who has this >>>>in there database post the moves? Thanks. >>> >>> >>>Hello Howard, >>>The game Gusev-Auerbakh was: >>> >>>1. Qxe5!! , fxe5 >>>2. Rf1 , Rc8 >>>3. Bd1 , Rc4 >>>4. Bb3 , b5 >>>5. Bxc4 , bxc4 >>>6. b3 , a5 >>>7. bxc4 , Qe7 >>>8. Kg2 , Qa3 >>>9. Rf2 , Qe7 >>>10. Rf1 , g5 >>>11. Rf5 , g4 >>>12. c5 , Qd8 >>>13. c6 , Qe7 >>>14. c7 >>>1-0 >>> >>>But why do you want to know this only now ? >> >>For a few reasons: >>1. I was not sure I was on the right path so I appreciate your help >>2. I was curious when Vincent L. posted the nice Rc4 defensive setup >>if Averbakh also played this and I see now that he did. >> >>Now that you posted the game score do you think there is a better defense >>for black? For example is there some hope in: >> >>6. b3 cxb >>7. axb a5 >> >>And I may as well ask now, please post some variations >>that erase all hope of a black draw. I don't mind admitting >>that I don't see a clear win and ask for your input or to the footnotes >>of the game if those exist for the above alternative. Thanks. > > > >Hello Howard, >I am not sure cause of my bad english but your previous post seem to be >agressive. >There is no footnotes of cxb variation. >Yes this variation seem to be interesting but I think that white is winning but >I have no >found forced variations but IMHO white must put the king on g3 and push pawns. >I will think of this position deeper and try to find a forced win for white, you >can >also search for yourself and maybe we will find the win. Like you I believe there is a win for white but whenever I think I've found a forcing sequence, Black seems to slip out of the danger. I'm trying different sequences of waiting moves with the white king and rook in order to place the black queen in an awkward position. Computers are not much help here as they always want to force the draw for white. >Sorry for my bad >english and I hope >that your previous post was not agressive. I'm not sure what I said to offend you. You could ask here or through email if that is better, about what phrase you thought was aggressive. By aggressive I'm guessing you mean rude or mean? My post was not meant to be mean to you. As far as your English, I'm envious of all the people here, like yourself, who communicate in a language you were not raised on. And if you find a solution to white winning this I'll be even more envious :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.