Author: Michael Neish
Date: 19:06:25 02/19/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 2000 at 12:51:31, James T. Walker wrote: >Hello Mark, >You are never going to get the facts. You are only going to get half truths and >different sides of the story. No matter which side you are on, you are probably >only going to be half right (Maybe less). In this case there are actually more >than 2 sides and I am certain there are some secrets yet to be told and we will >never hear them. Today, communications problems again? Who was declared the >winner today? >Jim Walker I'm not sure which side you're arguing for, but anyway I agree with you. If you are aware that you're only being told half-truths then you should also know that it's reckless to form a quick conclusion. I saw posts strongly accusing Adams and Kasparov pretty soon after the fiasco occurred. And after it starts it's like the domino effect with people picking up on what's been said, and taking it a little further, until the claims are outrageously disproportionate with the actual events. Let's say (and I'm not suggesting this will happen) that some fact comes to light which completely clears Adams of any suspicious behaviour. All those who insulted him will be made to look pretty bad. Mike.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.