Author: odell hall
Date: 00:03:08 02/20/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 20, 2000 at 01:51:23, blass uri wrote: >It is not fair to count the last 3 games of Deep Junior because the system >favour the computer's performance. > >The humans knew that 1:1 is probably a disaster for them and this situation >leads them to decisions that do not give them the best result. > >There should be no rule of fast games against computers if people want to have >an idea about the rating of computers at 1 hour/game > >It is better to use another game in the same time control or flip a coin when >the result is 1:1 in future tournaments. > >Uri Uri who's side are you on anyway?? I was under the obviously mistaken impression that you were a die hard junior loyalist, now where does all this sympathy for the humans come from, they gave junior an obvious and unmistakable raw deal. You cannot make any excuses for the humans they were simply outplayed. I did not hear the first grandmaster that Deep junior beat make any excuses when he lost, he just admitted that he was very impressed with junior's play and thought that it would have a 50% chance of winning the tournament, sounds like he was right on the money.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.