Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: MODERATION Michael Adams Why not against Piket ?

Author: James T. Walker

Date: 05:01:52 02/20/00

Go up one level in this thread


On February 19, 2000 at 21:35:32, Nick Kratsias wrote:

>Didn't Shay Bushinsky write earlier that kasparovchess was his company?  Why
>didn't shredder get to play in this tournament - it won the wmccc and paderborn
>championships.  In Enrique's tournament it lost many games because it used a
>regular book, not the same book as in the wmccc.  And Kasparov had a better
>chance against junior than against Addams.  Junior is a good program, but it was
>not under any discrimination.  Picket was not forfeited because Kasparov gave
>him a favor.  It would be absurd to do any favors for junior, because that
>would've been harmful to Addams because of time.  If a machine were to play Pete
>Samprass in a match, and it decided to take a 2 hour shit break, wouldn't it be
>forfeited also?

Please tell me where you read that Junior took a 2 hour shit break or give us
the quote and the source so I will be as enlightened as you.
Jim Walker



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.