Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 05:12:24 02/20/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 2000 at 21:35:32, Nick Kratsias wrote: >Didn't Shay Bushinsky write earlier that kasparovchess was his company? Why >didn't shredder get to play in this tournament - it won the wmccc and paderborn >championships. In Enrique's tournament it lost many games because it used a >regular book, not the same book as in the wmccc. And Kasparov had a better >chance against junior than against Addams. Junior is a good program, but it was >not under any discrimination. Picket was not forfeited because Kasparov gave >him a favor. It would be absurd to do any favors for junior, because that >would've been harmful to Addams because of time. If a machine were to play Pete >Samprass in a match, and it decided to take a 2 hour shit break, wouldn't it be >forfeited also? I don't think is reasonable to assume that such a feature would be implemented in a tennis machine :o) Best wishes... Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.