Author: leonid
Date: 05:29:46 02/20/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 2000 at 23:30:25, Eelco de Groot wrote: >On February 19, 2000 at 21:58:49, Tom Kerrigan wrote: > >>On February 19, 2000 at 21:41:42, Nick Kratsias wrote: >> >>>How much faster is p3-550, than p2-400, k6-2-450, p100, k6-3-450, p3-400? >>>A chess program seems to be 12 times faster on a p2-400 than on a p100. That's >>>because the computer is 12 times faster, right? >> >>These numbers are for my simple chess program, TSCP. >> >>Pentium/100 = 1.0 >> >>Pentium III/550 = 4.74 >>Pentium II/400 = 3.42 >>K6-2/450 = 4.73 (K6-3 should be the same) >>Pentium III/400 = 3.45 (I don't think these exist?) >> >>Your mileage may vary. >> >>-Tom > >Hello Tom, > >I just posted on Rebel Board the impression I had that the K-6 III has "on die" >L2 cache (For people even more layman than me: small, fast piece of memory for >fast access by the CPU of which there are different "levels", L1, L2, L3) and >therefore was faster, for Rebel at least, than K-6 II. Do you think the >difference for TSCP to be much smaller? > >Partial results with Rebel 10 from the benchmark-page: > >Pentium II 450 0:11 0:50 1:21 2554 >Pentium II Xeon 450 0:09 0:45 1:13 2558 >AMD K6-2 450 0:09 0:43 1:10 2560 >AMD K6-3 450 0:07 0:36 1:00 2566 > >Regards, Eelco It will be nice if you will put the position that you tried on different computers. Thanks, Leonid.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.