Author: Eelco de Groot
Date: 09:39:45 02/20/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 20, 2000 at 08:29:46, leonid wrote: >On February 19, 2000 at 23:30:25, Eelco de Groot wrote: > >>On February 19, 2000 at 21:58:49, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >> >>>On February 19, 2000 at 21:41:42, Nick Kratsias wrote: >>> >>>>How much faster is p3-550, than p2-400, k6-2-450, p100, k6-3-450, p3-400? >>>>A chess program seems to be 12 times faster on a p2-400 than on a p100. That's >>>>because the computer is 12 times faster, right? >>> >>>These numbers are for my simple chess program, TSCP. >>> >>>Pentium/100 = 1.0 >>> >>>Pentium III/550 = 4.74 >>>Pentium II/400 = 3.42 >>>K6-2/450 = 4.73 (K6-3 should be the same) >>>Pentium III/400 = 3.45 (I don't think these exist?) >>> >>>Your mileage may vary. >>> >>>-Tom >> >>Hello Tom, >> >>I just posted on Rebel Board the impression I had that the K-6 III has "on die" >>L2 cache (For people even more layman than me: small, fast piece of memory for >>fast access by the CPU of which there are different "levels", L1, L2, L3) and >>therefore was faster, for Rebel at least, than K-6 II. Do you think the >>difference for TSCP to be much smaller? >> >>Partial results with Rebel 10 from the benchmark-page: >> >>Pentium II 450 0:11 0:50 1:21 2554 >>Pentium II Xeon 450 0:09 0:45 1:13 2558 >>AMD K6-2 450 0:09 0:43 1:10 2560 >>AMD K6-3 450 0:07 0:36 1:00 2566 >> >>Regards, Eelco > > >It will be nice if you will put the position that you tried on different >computers. > >Thanks, >Leonid. Sorry, Leonid, that was a bit of a misunderstanding. These are not my results but results posted on Rebel's benchmarkpage. In the message two places below there is a link to the page. There are diagrams of the three test-positions there. Sorry if I was unclear, Eelco
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.