Author: Wayne Lowrance
Date: 16:13:32 02/21/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 21, 2000 at 13:15:19, Mike S. wrote: >A long-time computer tournament is held by readers of CSS at > >http://www.computerschach.de/leserturnier/start.htm > >Thinking time is ranging from 6h upwards, depending on the hardware. But there >are some top programs missing, and only a few games are finished yet. I'm afraid >we can never have enough results for reliable statistics under such conditions >while the programs are still up to date. > >I have no correspondence chess experience, but if I had to play such a game, I >would rely more on those programs of which I have the impression to be more >knowledge based and positionally strong, because at a very long thinking times >each program will find the tactical things anyway. > >If a fast searching program recommends a strange looking sacrifice after 5 hours >of thinking time, you will hardly be able to analyze if it's sound. Even a GM >would need days for it. 3 hours more and it could find a refutation. I think, >any sharp sacrificial computer play from more than a few minutes on a >state-of-the-art system, is beyond human grasp. It would be a question of >confidence, not of conviction. > >From my program collection, the best *positional* test results have: >CSTal II, Shredder 3, Socrates 3, AnMon 5.01, Comet B02 (some newer versions not >yet tested). All these programs are *not* among the top five in my tactics and >endgame test results. > >Regards, >M.Scheidl Thank you
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.