Author: Pete Galati
Date: 22:51:17 02/21/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 22, 2000 at 00:52:25, Michael Neish wrote: >On February 21, 2000 at 07:54:57, Michael Cummings wrote: > >>I think the current moderators are doing something right, due to the fact that >>there has been very little conflict between fellow members. >> >>A few comments about people outside this forum regarding forfeit matches, but >>apart from that nothing much. >> >>I think with the new measures Steve has put into place, and the moderators doing >>a fine job on banning probably the last of various clones of past trouble >>makers, that this place will get back to being nice and calm, and computer chess >>related. > >Of course the moderators should always be applauded for doing their >less-than-enviable job of keeping things running smoothly. > >About the lack of "trouble", I don't really know, but I wonder whether the >recent Adams-Junior episode has something to do with it. What I mean is, when >something happens which causes collective outrage, then there is no cause for >the sort of bickering that can lead to trouble. Maybe "trouble" occurs in the >quiet times when there's nothing major to discuss. > >I'm not saying this is correct -- just food for thought that's all. > >Mike. I'm gratefull not to have the bickering going on right now, I'm also glad I don't see the Chris clones at the moment because he didn't really talk about Chess programs, just came to dissagree, so I'm glad that that's all gone. But, (and not that _I_ should be the measuring stick) it's been rather boring to me lately at CCC, on the other hand I did get some very useful advise to me during this boring spell, so that's more important than if it's boring or not. I think things are running very smoothly, whoever is responsible for that, thanks. Pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.