Author: Didzis Cirulis
Date: 01:25:31 02/22/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 22, 2000 at 04:05:36, blass uri wrote: >On February 22, 2000 at 03:03:43, Didzis Cirulis wrote: > >>On February 22, 2000 at 00:44:25, Harald Faber wrote: >> >>>Again Tal on the Athlon500, Junior6 on the K6-200, both 64MB RAM, 3h/game >>>4.5-0.5 in favour of Junior. Look at the games, convincing wins for J6 and >>>doubtful sac(s) by Tal. >>>I have seen enough, the games all look the same, there is no need to continue >>>this match. >> >>Hi Harald, >> >>When I played Chess Tal 2.03 vs Junior and then vs Century, it too lost those >>matches by equal score of 5-3. (Games available) That is a different score then >>yours and I can see one reason only for this difference. You played blitz, but I >>used 40/40 tournament control. I too noticed that Chess tal 2.03 is getting >>kicked down to the last postitions of crosstable when I played my Y2K Welcome >>tournament at 60/game control. But I was surprised to see Tal's play after I >>switched to 40/40 tournament in test matches I mentioned above. Much better. I >>would say that Tal's blitz time management (for my standard testing method) >>is...er...a bit not perfect. > >I did not see something strange in the time management of tal. > >The games are posted with time per move and I do not see for example that tal is >using 1 second per move in 3 hours per game for the first moves or for the last >moves. > >Can you give examples for the bad time managemant of tal? > >Maybe the problem is that tal sometimes plays without thinking in x hours/game >when it did not expect the opponent's move but I think that if it is the case >then it can be proved by looking at tal's depthes. > >The games are posted only with Junior's evaluations so I cannot know if it is >the problem. > >Maybe there is another bug and tal can produce better moves in the same time >if it knew that the time control is x hours/y moves and not x hours/game > >I do not have tal so I do not know. > >Uri I am playing a small manually operated "fun" match between Chess Tiger 12.0en and Chess tal 2.03. Time control is rather fast: 40 moves in 10 minutes. Tiger is a favorite, IMHO, and time is just the "not the best" for Tal. 200MMX my standard testing procedure (that is PB off, 16 MB for Tiger, 16 + 4 Mb for Tal) Chess Tiger - Tal 1-0 this far What is your predicition in 10 games? 9-1 for Tiger? 7-3 for Tiger? :-) Tiger is not Junior, but still if Harald's results are taken as the indicator, there could easily be 9.5-0.5 for Tiger, and that is not what I expect. Didzis
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.