Author: pete
Date: 01:32:13 02/22/00
Go up one level in this thread
>>gambitmaster 2425 2444 | 35% 5 31 | 2425 2356 21 > >Bringer looks impressive here. Is Bringer new on this list or is it a sudden >rise? Bringer has been quite a while on the list now . Recent standard results : 0 2425 gambitmast 2617 crafty 0-1 [ sr 45 10] E15 Res 20-Feb-00 1 2546 DiepX 2434 gambitmast 0-1 [ sr 45 10] C92 Res 18-Feb-00 2 2340 JudgeTurpi 2411 gambitmast 0-1 [ sr 45 10] A45 Mat 13-Feb-00 3 2397 gambitmast 2447 PostModern = [ sr 45 10] E41 Rep 13-Feb-00 4 2497 DiepX 2395 gambitmast 1-0 [ sr 45 10] B48 Mat 13-Feb-00 5 2407 gambitmast 2577 crafty 0-1 [ sr 45 10] D58 Res 12-Feb-00 6 2350 GnuChess 2397 gambitmast 0-1 [ su 75 10] B40 Mat 08-Feb-00 7 2466 PostModern 2397 gambitmast 1-0 [ sr 75 10] A61 Res 07-Feb-00 8 2411 gambitmast 2586 EA6PZ 0-1 [ sr 15 10] E42 Res 06-Feb-00 9 2577 EA6PZ 2420 gambitmast 1-0 [ sr 15 10] C14 Res 06-Feb-00 10 2430 gambitmast 2323 Amateur 1-0 [ sr 75 10] E32 Res 05-Feb-00 11 2335 Amateur 2418 gambitmast = [ sr 75 10] B90 Rep 05-Feb-00 12 2422 gambitmast 2331 Amateur 1-0 [ sr 15 2] E15 Res 05-Feb-00 13 2344 Amateur 2409 gambitmast 0-1 [ sr 15 2] A45 Res 05-Feb-00 14 2395 gambitmast 2378 Beadle 1-0 [ sr 15 0] A46 Mat 03-Feb-00 15 2383 MissSilico 2375 gambitmast = [ sr 15 2] D86 NM 04-Feb-00 16 2375 gambitmast 2383 MissSilico = [ sr 15 2] D85 Rep 03-Feb-00 17 2382 gambitmast 2312 AnatKarp 1-0 [ sr 10 10] D02 Res 01-Feb-00 18 2368 gambitmast 2326 AnatKarp 1-0 [ sr 10 10] D21 Mat 01-Feb-00 As you can see : not that many games but quite fair results . Usually standard games can be better played offline for Europeans ... There is a clear trend for standard ( and to some extent blitz ) games on ICC btw . The computer accounts tend to play a lot against each other ;the K-factor is quite high and there are always new accounts with fast hardware and top commercial programs ; so the amateur programs as a trend go down as they are the first victims for the new accounts . My feeling is that Bringer is still a little underrated now ( looking at the rating development ) but as you can see another factor is it played a lot against known opponents who not came out of nowhere with a 1700-rated Tiger . Also Bringer plays more or less with the tournament version ( only a little less RAM and a wider opening book ) where other accounts might use more experimental versions . ICC ratings shouldn't be taken too serious anyway ; if you look where the jump came from it is mainly due to the last game against diepx . Bringer is strong when it gets 9 ply finished all the time is my feeling ; and that needs some time . I wish more people would give it a try but it seems blitz games are much more common .
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.