Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 11:58:41 02/23/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 23, 2000 at 14:40:59, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On February 23, 2000 at 12:33:50, Bruce Moreland wrote: >>Has anyone considered that this might be a major source of error, perhaps rating >>inflation? If anything, it will prevent rating inflation to continue to test against a known opponent. >i don't think they consider about their methods. Really? On what do you base this opinion? You can always make improvements to any scientific methodology. But without question the SSDF creates the best and most scientific and systematic testing of chess programs. No one else even comes close. If you have ideas for improvements, why not say what they are? Saying something like "they could improve their methods" has no value because it is vacuuous. Of course it is true, but provides no information.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.