Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 12:19:39 02/23/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 23, 2000 at 14:40:59, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On February 23, 2000 at 12:33:50, Bruce Moreland wrote: >>Has anyone considered that this might be a major source of error, perhaps rating >>inflation? > >i don't think they consider about their methods. Hi! In example you critizised us for counting doubles. 12 out of 400+ games(Tiger), less than 3%. I have seen you publish 2 games Tal-CM6000 0-1 with the same opening it is 100%, but of course maybe you have played some other games that you don´t count for some reason that we can't understand and even don't consider, as our methods are so primitive and stupid. Bertil
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.