Author: José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba
Date: 13:43:17 02/23/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 23, 2000 at 15:43:34, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On February 23, 2000 at 15:19:39, Bertil Eklund wrote: > >>On February 23, 2000 at 14:40:59, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >>>On February 23, 2000 at 12:33:50, Bruce Moreland wrote: >>>>Has anyone considered that this might be a major source of error, perhaps rating >>>>inflation? >>> >>>i don't think they consider about their methods. >> >>Hi! >> >>In example you critizised us for counting doubles. 12 out of 400+ games(Tiger), >>less than 3%. > >3% double games in 400+ published games of tiger. >and you believe this ? >nonsense. there is and there ever WAS more than 3 % double-games in the ssdf. >10 years ago. 5 years ago. 1 year ago. today. >you want to tell us that only 3 % of the games are senseless because they >are doubles ??? > >3 % of the games of learning programs are maybe doubles. >but look in your games and be honest and count the amount of doubles. >and than come again and tell us that this amount of games is only 3 % > >>I have seen you publish 2 games Tal-CM6000 0-1 with the same >>opening it is 100%, > > >???? > >in different tournament ? on different machines ?? >i don't understand you. my tournament is a swiss-tournament. >anybody plays against other opponents each round. when cstal has played >cm6, it has played against cm ONCE in a tournament. > > >>but of course maybe you have played some other games that >>you don´t count for some reason that we can't understand and even don't >>consider, as our methods are so primitive and stupid. > >?????? > >What do you want. I have made a NORMAL comment to a discussion here. >and your answer on a normal critics i did , reffering a statement that was >ok from bruce, is THIS KIND OF behaviour here. >Sorry. this is not civilized ! >You call me indirectly cheating and you call my "methods" (whatever this is: >playing a swiss tournament does not seem to be stupid to me anyhow. i would >say somebody pressing a button and going to bed is more stupid, since >he is only reduced to press a button, even an animal could do the same) >primitive and stupid. i do the same ICCA and others do all their life: >this is watching computer-chess-programs play against each other. >you press a button in sweden and go to bed. what is more primitive. >what ICCA and the guys in paderborn do ? or what you do ? > >>Bertil > >I will not ask the moderators for censoring your statement. >IMO your statements is a good example how YOUR kind of people behave >with critics and comments concerning their work. >Your behaviour, especially your misplaced insults, I do not see any insult in Bertil´s post. José. >shows >the same arrogance and intolerance to other people's opinion >like your methods in sweden show since the day your ssdf-list has been >found years ago. > >change your methods. be open to constructive changes, and the critics >will end. but insulting people is IMO not the way to behave in computerchess >world. i will not accept this. others will not accept this.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.