Author: Harald Faber
Date: 21:52:19 02/23/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 23, 2000 at 14:38:43, Thorsten Czub wrote: >i don't really understand what harald wants to show. we were the same opinion >that > >a) shredder4 >b) tiger12 >c) junior6a > >are the strongest programs in the moment. > >harald tested shredder4 against cstal. >i said: no wonder that cstal loses, shredder is the strongest program in the >moment. > >harald said: it would also lose to others. > >i said: it would lose to other that are as strong as shredder4 is. And YOU wrote that the others would compete with Tal, that means that all others, Junior, Tiger etc., are clearly weaker than Shredder. Your own words. And you also wrote that Shredder is kind of "fear opponent" to Tal. Now after Junior-Tal you change your mind, nothing new. Thorsten, you always complain about anything in my matches. Hardware not fast enough, then not equal, wrong opponent, played with (Windows!-)autoplayer. I guess I can go on playing Tal vs several opponents, each time Tal loses (and that will be more often than you would like to see) you complain about anything. Final offer: Choose an opponent of your wish (that supports autoplayer!) to play on the K6-200 vs Tal on Athlon. And then swear to God that you won't complain if Tal loses. :-)
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.