Author: Hans Christian Lykke
Date: 04:24:58 02/24/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 24, 2000 at 06:58:14, Amir Ban wrote: >On February 23, 2000 at 15:01:14, Bertil Eklund wrote: > >>On February 23, 2000 at 12:33:50, Bruce Moreland wrote: >> >>>On February 23, 2000 at 11:08:43, blass uri wrote: >>> >>>>shredder2 was not tested on the fast hardware because the ssdf always use fast >>>>hardware for new programs and old hardware for old programs. >>> >>>Has anyone considered that this might be a major source of error, perhaps rating >>>inflation? >> >>Why? Any suggestions of what to do instead. Do you think humans should refuse to >>play opponents rated 200 elo higher or lower. >> >>>"Always" is a bad word to use when you are trying to get an accurate result from >>>a system that is designed to produce accurate ratings within a pool where >>>everyone plays everyone under the same average conditions. >> >>Have you ever thought about that the human pool works in the same way, except >>for being much bigger? >> >>There is a slight inflation because some older programs have no >>learning-function. >> >>Of course the pool should be calibrated but not because of someones gut-feelings >>or wild guesses. >> >>Bertil >>> >>>bruce > >I think your real mistake is to use Shredder as the favorite competitor on the >MMX200 machine. Some people see testing on unequal platforms as an injustice to >the program running on the weaker machine, and by now you should understand that >you will not be able to convince them otherwise. Shredder is highly protected by >some frequent posters here, and you are asking for trouble by testing it in the >way you do. You can easily avoid it by picking a different program to test. You >can take Junior 5/MMX200, for example, with my blessing. > >Amir As you can see in the following, Shredder is not the favorite competitor on MMX200 Machine. - Junior 5 is more favorite than Shredder 2. This is some result from the latest SSDF-list 1 Junior 6.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz, 2706 Junior5 P200X 33-9 Shred 2 P200X 20-6 2 Chess Tiger 12.0 DOS 128MB K6-2 450 MHz, 2682 Junior5 P200X 31.5-14.5 Shred 2 P200X 28.5-11.5 3 Nimzo 7.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz, 2661 Junior5 P200X 30-10 Shred 2 P200X 26-14 5 Junior 5.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz, 2629 Junior5 P200X 27.5-12.5 Shred 2 P200X 33.5-6.5 7 Hiarcs 7.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz, 2624 Junior5 P200X 23-17 No games against Shredder 2 on P200MMX
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.