Author: Steve Coladonato
Date: 07:36:58 02/24/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 24, 2000 at 08:30:12, Albert Silver wrote: >On February 24, 2000 at 03:57:45, Peter Kappler wrote: > >>On February 23, 2000 at 21:49:01, Richard Heldmann wrote: >> >>>Any opinions of Bookup vs. Chessbase 7.0 or Chess Assistant 5? >> >>I can comment on CB 7.0 and Bookup, but not CA5: >> >>CB 7.0 is a full-fledged database, with numerous searching features. It's a >>great tool if you're a serious player who wants to do lots of opening research, >>or just enjoys studying lots of grandmaster games. >> >>Bookup doesn't have the database features of CB7. Instead, it's geared towards >>helping you manage your existing opening repertoire. It allows you to enter >>variations and annotate key positions. These variations are stored in a "tree" >>structure for easy navigation. ChessBase has some support for constructing move >>trees from a collection of games, but it's more cumbersome than the Bookup >>method. (If ChessBase ever fixes this, I'll stop using Bookup.) > >CA5 has all this plus a small openings encyclopedia (Openings 2000) to boot. You >can build an opening repertoire by pulling in information from various sources >and have it build a tree for this (a 1,000,000 game database WITH a complete >tree takes up less that 230 MB), plus the tree of your repertoire can directly >access the tree information (statistics) from other databases. Ex: You build a >small repertoire on the various lines you play in the Sicilian and build a tree >for it. From the tree itself you can look at the statistics for the various >positions from your main 1,000,000+ game database as well without having to open >it too and switch back and forth. Naturally, you can annotate the positions >directly in the tree or in the games according to preference. You can also make >a copy of the openings encyclopedia and use it as a base reference to build on >(with the same possibilities as above). The advantage is that the encyclopedia >has a convenient system of folders that makes it sometimes easier to organize >everything IMO. > >> >>Both programs include chess engines for analysis of positions. CB7 can use any >>of the Chessbase family of engines (Fritz, Junior, Hiarcs, Nimzo, etc) while >>Bookup only includes Zarkov. > >CA5 comes with Chess Tiger 12 and Crafty 17.6 (which can have it's various >parameters modified and can be upgraded as newer versions come out), plus can >use all the Winboard engines and MCS engines (Zarkov, Shredder 4, Nimzo 2000, >Wchess 2000, but not the Genius family) as internal engines. Other programs such >as Rebel, Mchess, and Genius can be called upon as external engines to analyze >positions and insert analysis directly in CA. > > Albert Silver > I'd just like to add that CA5 can also analyze complete games as a blunder check and insert the better continuation as a variation. I have done this with the internal Tiger engine and will be experimenting with the external engines later. The one draw back is that only the first move of the variation is inserted into the game. However, you can then run an analysis of the position and have the complete variation inserted. Steve >> >>Chessbase definitely sports the prettier interface. It's also much more complex >>- be prepared to spend a weekend learning all the features. >> >>I use both programs reguarly, and think ChessBase offers better overall value. >>Bookup 2000 is due for release in early March, so you might want to checkout >>some of the new features. >> >>--Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.