Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Five games CSTal 2.03 - Junior 6a

Author: Didzis Cirulis

Date: 05:04:49 02/25/00

Go up one level in this thread


On February 25, 2000 at 06:51:00, Jari Huikari wrote:

>On February 23, 2000 at 14:38:43, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>
>>On February 22, 2000 at 15:41:00, Jari Huikari wrote:
>>>It'll need much more games that one can get trustworthy results. A few
>>>games can end 6-0, 0-6 or whatever.
>
>>if you want i can start a match junior vs. cstal 20 games manually.
>>or shredder versus cstal 20 games. i have no problems with that.
>
>>if i am right, and the autoplayer changes results, i shall get better results
>>although cstal has no hardware advantage on MY system.
>>Shall we try out ?
>
>Why not. I also believe that using Autoplayer may change results.
>I only wanted to say, in common, that one would need bigger sample
>for trustworthy results. I have no spesific opinion in your discussion
>about these different programs.
>

I am playing a match between Chess Tiger 12.0en and Chess Tal 2.03
Manual games. 40/120. Pentium 200MMX, 16Mb for Chess Tieger and 16 + 4 for Tal.
My standard testing procedure to ensure that match is fair, even if played on
one PC.
First two games was 2-0 for Tiger, but (and this is a BIG but ;) Tal did nothing
stupid to be blamed for.

Game 1 was a very sharp attacking game where opposite castling was a result of
book. It was so forced that even one move could decide. Tiger came first.
Game 2 was a good game for Tal. Why good? it managed to create a very intense
attacking position slowly building it up from a complex position. Tal would
certainly kill me in this position ir I was his opponent, but this time it was
Chess Tiger.

Game 3 Chess Tal white = draw

Game 4 Chess Tal white, 19 moves in game, Chess Tiger evaluates it as -0.12 = in
favour of Tal. Tal is still in book.

Games this far:

[Event "40/120"]
[Site "Riga"]
[Date "2000.02.23"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Chess Tiger 12.0en"]
[Black "Chess Tal 2.03"]
[Result "1-0"]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 e6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 d6 6. g4 Nc6 7. g5 Nd7 8. Be3
Be7 9. h4 O-O 10. Qd2 a6 11. O-O-O Nxd4 12. Bxd4 b5 13. a3 Bb7 14. f4 Qa5 15.
Kb1 Rfe8 16. h5 e5 17. Be3 b4 18. Nd5 Bxd5 19. exd5 Reb8 20. h6 Qa4 21. hxg7
bxa3 22. b3 Kxg7 23. Bd3 Kf8 24. Rxh7 Ke8 25. g6 fxg6 26. Bxg6+ Kd8 27. fxe5
Qb4 28. e6 Nf8 29. Rxe7 Qxd2 30. Rxd2 a2+ 31. Kxa2 Nxg6 32. Rd7+ Kc8 33. Rd4
Ne5 34. Rg7 Rb7 35. Rg8+ Kc7 36. Rxa8 1-0

[Event "40/120"]
[Site "Riga"]
[Date "2000.02.24"]
[Round "2"]
[White "Chess Tiger 12.0en"]
[Black "Chess Tal 2.03"]
[Result "1-0"]

1. e4 c5 2. Nc3 Nc6 3. g3 g6 4. Bg2 Bg7 5. d3 e6 6. f4 Nge7 7. Nf3 d6 8. O-O
O-O 9. Be3 b6 10. d4 Ba6 11. Re1 Qc7 12. a4 Rad8 13. Nb5 Qb8 14. c3 Bb7 15. Qe2
Na5 16. b4 cxb4 17. cxb4 Nac6 18. Rab1 d5 19. e5 Nf5 20. Bf2 h5 21. Rec1 Rc8
22. Nc3 Rfd8 23. Qd1 Re8 24. Bh3 Nce7 25. Ng5 Rc7 26. Rb2 Rec8 27. Rbc2 a5 28.
b5 Rc4 29. Bf1 R4c7 30. Bd3 Kf8 31. Kf1 Ke8 32. Nh7 Nh6 33. Bg1 Nef5 34. Kg2
Ba8 35. Qf3 Bb7 36. h3 Rd7 37. Qd1 Rc4 38. Bxc4 dxc4+ 39. Kh2 Qd8 40. Qe1 h4
41. g4 Nxd4 42. Bxd4 Rxd4 43. Ne2 Rd3 44. Rxc4 Rd2 45. R4c2 Qd5 46. Qf1 Rxc2
47. Rxc2 Qd3 48. Rc3 Qd5 49. Nf6+ Bxf6 50. exf6 Qd6 51. Rc1 g5 52. Qf2 Ng8 53.
Qd4 Qxd4 54. Nxd4 Nxf6 55. fxg5 Ne4 56. g6 fxg6 57. Nxe6 Nf6 58. Re1 Bc8 1-0

[Event "40/120"]
[Site "Riga"]
[Date "2000.02.25"]
[Round "3"]
[White "Chess Tal 2.03"]
[Black "Chess Tiger 2.03"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]

1. c4 e5 2. Nc3 Nf6 3. Nf3 Nc6 4. g3 Bb4 5. Bg2 O-O 6. O-O e4 7. Ng5 Bxc3 8.
bxc3 Re8 9. f3 e3 10. d3 d5 11. Qb3 Na5 12. Qa3 c6 13. cxd5 cxd5 14. f4 Bg4 15.
Re1 h6 16. Nf3 Nc6 17. Rb1 Qd7 18. Qa4 a6 19. Rb6 Qc7 20. Rb1 b5 21. Qb3 Rab8
22. Qa3 Qb6 23. Bb2 Bf5 24. Ba1 Rbc8 25. h3 Bh7 26. Kh2 Re6 27. Rbc1 Rc7 28.
Red1 Rc8 29. Re1 Rc7 30. Red1 Rc8 31. Re1 1/2-1/2




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.