Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Xie Jun Vs Deep Junior 6.0

Author: Jorge Pichard

Date: 18:04:06 02/25/00


There is no questions that any of these programs (Deep Junior 6.0  Fritz 6.0
Shredder 4.0 Nimzo 2000 and Rebel 10) can easily beat Xie Jun, which is only
rated 2545 by FIDE; Plus her style is just perfect to pit her against any of
these computer Chess Programs. I don't believe that she will change her style in
just two weeks and adjust to the Anticomputer Style, and even if she does
decides to play positionally instead of tactically, DJ has sufficient positional
knowledge to beat even a Great GM like Adams, which is among the 10 best in the
world. Just remember that Anand develops his Anticomputer style over the las 10
years and Rebel managed to draw against him in tournament regulation time two
years ago.

Kasparovchess Website never mentioned the Quad Mhz capacity of Deep Junior 6.0
in the Grand Prix last week. I have this information to share with all of you
Chess Computer Enthusiasts. Last week my friend and I tested Deep Junior 6.0
using his dual Intel Pentium 500 Mhz against my Junior 6.0 using a single AMD
ATHLON at 800 Mhz, we were eager to know how much better Deep Junior 6.0 really
is versus the Simple Junior 6.0. Now, if the asumption that DJ is 1.8 stronger
than Junior 6.0 than it was logical to pit his Dual Pentium III 500 against my
ATHLON 800 Mhz. After 10 games of 1 hour per game each, Junior 6.0 beat Deep
Junior 6.0 by a small margin 0f 5.5 to 4.5 games. In conclusion if you can't
afford to buy a dual Processor for Deep Junior, then simply buy the fastest and
most economical computer available in the market, and you will get the same
performance, unless you decide to use the same Mhz capacity for the Dual
Processors as for the single processor, then the difference is enormous.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.