Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is 5:36 too hard to beat?

Author: Ernst Walet

Date: 01:41:11 02/26/00

Go up one level in this thread


If you insist:-)

New position
r3b1nr/ppqn1k1p/4p1p1/1P1pPpP1/1B1N1P1P/R7/3Q4/R3KB2 w Q - 0 1

Analysis by Fritz 6:

1.Rxa7
  =  (-0.22)   Depth: 1/4   00:00:00
1.Rxa7 Rxa7 2.Rxa7
  ²  (0.56)   Depth: 1/4   00:00:00
1.Rxa7 Rxa7 2.Rxa7
  ²  (0.56)   Depth: 2/8   00:00:00
1.Rxa7 Rxa7 2.Rxa7 Ne7 3.Bxe7 Kxe7
  ²  (0.44)   Depth: 3/10   00:00:00
1.Rxa7 Rxa7 2.Rxa7 Qb6 3.Ra8
  ²  (0.56)   Depth: 4/12   00:00:00  1kN
1.Rxa7 Rxa7 2.Rxa7 Qb6 3.Ra8 Ne7 4.Bxe7 Kxe7
  ²  (0.44)   Depth: 5/20   00:00:00  6kN
1.Rxa7 Rxa7 2.Rxa7 Qb6 3.Ra8 Ne7 4.Bg2
  ²  (0.59)   Depth: 6/20   00:00:00  13kN
1.Rxa7 Rxa7 2.Rxa7 Ne7 3.Bg2 Qb6 4.Ra8
  ²  (0.59)   Depth: 7/20   00:00:00  48kN
1.Rxa7 Rxa7 2.Rxa7 Ne7 3.Bg2 Qb6 4.Ra8 Nc5 5.h5 gxh5
  ²  (0.66)   Depth: 8/21   00:00:00  114kN
1.Bd6
  ²  (0.69)   Depth: 8/26   00:00:00  217kN
1.Bd6 Qb6 2.Rc3 Qd8 3.Rc7 a5 4.bxa6 bxa6
  ±  (0.78)   Depth: 8/26   00:00:01  241kN
1.Bd6 Qb6 2.Rc1 a6 3.Bc7 Qa7 4.bxa6 Nb8 5.axb7 Qxb7
  ±  (0.75)   Depth: 9/24   00:00:01  405kN
1.Bd6!
  ±  (1.06)   Depth: 10/29   00:00:04  1209kN
1.Bd6 Qb6 2.Rc3 a6 3.bxa6 bxa6 4.Rc6 Qb7 5.Bxa6 Qa7
  ±  (1.16)   Depth: 10/29   00:00:04  1400kN
1.Bd6 Qb6 2.Rc3 a6 3.bxa6 bxa6 4.Rc6 Qb7 5.Bxa6 Qa7
  ±  (1.16)   Depth: 11/28   00:00:09  2792kN
1.Bd6 Qb6 2.Rc1 a6 3.Rb3 axb5 4.Nxe6 Ra4 5.Qxd5 Ne7
  ±  (1.22)   Depth: 12/34   00:00:22  7357kN
1.Rc3
  ±  (1.25)   Depth: 12/34   00:00:41  13628kN
1.Rc3 Nc5 2.Bxc5 Qd8 3.Bd6 a5 4.Rc7+ Bd7 5.b6 Ne7
  +-  (4.13)   Depth: 12/39   00:02:04  38634kN
1.Rc3!
  +-  (4.44)   Depth: 13/34   00:02:17  43226kN
1.Rc3 Qb6 2.Ba5 Qc5 3.Rxc5 Nxc5 4.Bb4 b6 5.Bxc5
  +-  (4.72)   Depth: 14/38   00:03:38  70665kN

PIII 450, 80MB hash.

Ernst.





On February 26, 2000 at 04:05:32, Ed Schröder wrote:

>[D]r3b1nr/ppqn1k1p/4p1p1/1P1pPpP1/1B1N1P1P/R7/3Q4/R3KB2 w Q - bm Nxe6 or Rc3;
>
>1. Nxe6 Kxe6 2. Rc3 Qd8 3. Qxd5+ Kxd5 4. O-O-O+ Ke4 5. Rc4+ Kf3 6. Rd3+
>Kf2 7. Rc2+ Kg1 8. Rd1 1-0
>
>or 1. Rc3 Qd8 2.Nex6
>
>Source: Megabyte (former dutch cc magazine)
>
>I have seen no follow-up's on this previous posted position.
>
>Is 5:36 too hard to beat?
>
>Please don't give me hope :-)
>
>Ed
>
>
>Rebel Century 1.2
>
>00:03:34 11.08  0.95   1.Bd6 Qb6 2.Rc3 a5 3.Bc7 Qa7 4.Rxa5
>                       Qxa5 5.Bxa5 Rxa5 6.Rc8  (212)
>
>00:04:24 12.00  1.07   1.Bd6 Qb6 2.Rc3 a5 3.bxa6 bxa6 4.Rac1+
>                       Qa7 5.Rc6 Ndf6 6.exf6 Bxc6  (237)
>
>00:05:36 12.09  1.07   1.Nxe6
>00:07:40 12.09  2.41   1.Nxe6 Kxe6 2.Rc3 Qb6 3.Ba5 Qg1
>                       4.O-O-O Qh1 5.Bg2 Qxh4 6.Qxd5+ Ke7
>                       7.Qd6+  (336)
>
>00:13:53 13.00  2.70   1.Nxe6 Kxe6 2.Rc3 Qb6 3.Ba5 Qg1
>                       4.O-O-O Ne7 5.Bg2  (495)
>
>00:14:13 13.03  2.70   1.Rc3
>00:15:10 13.03  3.66   1.Rc3 Nc5 2.Bxc5
>00:19:46 14.00  3.84   1.Rc3 Nc5 2.Bxc5 Qd8 3.Bd6 Bd7 4.Rc7
>                       b6 5.Raxa7+ Rxa7 6.Rxa7  (1074)
>
>PC: Athlon 1000 Mhz



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.