Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is 5:36 too hard to beat?

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 17:50:31 02/26/00

Go up one level in this thread


On February 26, 2000 at 14:56:58, Bruce Moreland wrote:

>On February 26, 2000 at 04:05:32, Ed Schröder wrote:
>
>>[D]r3b1nr/ppqn1k1p/4p1p1/1P1pPpP1/1B1N1P1P/R7/3Q4/R3KB2 w Q - bm Nxe6 or Rc3;
>>
>>1. Nxe6 Kxe6 2. Rc3 Qd8 3. Qxd5+ Kxd5 4. O-O-O+ Ke4 5. Rc4+ Kf3 6. Rd3+
>>Kf2 7. Rc2+ Kg1 8. Rd1 1-0
>>
>>or 1. Rc3 Qd8 2.Nex6
>>
>>Source: Megabyte (former dutch cc magazine)
>>
>>I have seen no follow-up's on this previous posted position.
>>
>>Is 5:36 too hard to beat?
>
>Mine finds Rc3 in 27 seconds on a P6/200, +2.6 after 36 seconds.  This would be
>4 or 5 seconds on the quad 450, of course.
>
>bruce

I get this on a quad 550:

               11     6.45     ++   1. Rc3!!
               11     8.26   2.03   1. Rc3 Qb6 2. Ba5 Qc5 3. Rxc5 Nxc5
                                    4. h5 gxh5 5. Nxf5 exf5 6. Qxd5+ Ne6
                                    7. Qxb7+
         (3)   11->   9.57   2.03   1. Rc3 Qb6 2. Ba5 Qc5 3. Rxc5 Nxc5
                                    4. h5 gxh5 5. Nxf5 exf5 6. Qxd5+ Ne6
                                    7. Qxb7+



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.