Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 04:29:37 02/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 26, 2000 at 20:33:09, Bertil Eklund wrote: >>what is the problem? >>he lives in france. >>i live in germany. >>he is french. i am german. >>he has bought a k6-3, i have bought a k6-3. >>he has played a game and i played a game. >>so what is your problem. shall i forbid HIM to post a game >>AFTER i had played mine ???? >>i was first, and later HE made a game in france. >> >No problem at all but I was a bit surprised when I checked your game in may >database and found another with same players and computers. > >>did i posted the game or him ?? >>you still did not answer who and when posted the game. >>why not ? >> >Do you think that I should check every game played by xx if it had been played >before, interrupt it and restart? if i would be the accurate-guy for the ssdf, i would collect all games in cbf or pgn , put it into a database and search for doubles. the machine is doing it itself. would throw out the doubles and count again. if you have ONE guy in charge for collecting results and data, there is no problem to do the accurate-job. since eric and i and other guys liking cstal and other programs are not interested in statistics or counting results the statistical way you do, we do of course not coordinate or collect all cstal games in a master-pool and proof them for doubles. why should we ? our intention is opposite to yours. we say: the game itself is important, not the result. so we discuss games, and do not have any statistical demand to fullfill. if i would be you, means: if i would be ssdf, i would of course make sure the data is in propper order. look, in the moment i do play out cstal vs. tiger. it looks cstal kills tiger in a classical tal-attack. how shall i post this without lots of people jumping on me like hell because they do not believe what they do not want to believe. but it happens. it would be much better when cstal would lose, so tiger could make more points and cstal results would be taken more seriously. but the program do not do me the favour. shit. i have to accept that cstal saw the king-attack much earlier than tiger. my girl friend is my witness that i startet this game ONCE and have not done any other game or pressed new game or whatever cheating some people believe i would do. i started the game and when i saw the tal-attack coming, i told her: oh - this will be problematic for me since people expect tiger to win. life surprises. even me. >You have accused us for almost everything between earth, heaven and hell and I >only told you that I have seen this line before. I have never accused you for >cheating. > >Keep up your good job in the intelligent chess forum! > >Bertil > >>how shall i influence or forbid somebody living in france >>i do not talk often, only sometimes via email, not to play certain >>openings ? >>he has no idea about what i do play, and i do have no idea what he does. >>we do not collect the data in ONE database, why should we. >> >>i don't see a problem in your point. >>and you still have not quoted the sources. why ? >>if you have a point, why don't you show it to me. >> >>did I posted the game or eric ?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.