Author: stuart taylor
Date: 06:01:53 02/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 27, 2000 at 07:03:53, stuart taylor wrote: >On February 27, 2000 at 04:59:17, Jeroen Noomen wrote: > >>On February 27, 2000 at 04:14:15, Johan Havegheer wrote: >> >>>Bad guess Jeroen, Little Goliath 2000 V2.0 gives Rc3 after only 1 second >>>score starts at +1.34 and goes up to 2.50 after 28" and 3.29 after 1 minute >>>All this on a AMD K6-2-400 Mhz. >> >>Sorry, but I don't count this as 'solved in 1 second'. In your case 1. Rc3 >>is chosen on pure positional grounds. Only when the program sees that >>1. Rc3 Qd8 is losing to 2. Nxe6! one can say that it sees through. Most >>programs expect 1. Rc3 Nc5, which loses a piece but avoids the mate. >> >>So The King is still best, as it sees after only 8 seconds that 1. Rc3 Qd8 >>is losing. LG2000 can't see this after only 1 second. See the score, which >>is +1.34. This doesn't indicate that the program sees the whole sequence. >> >>Regards, Jeroen > >All this is childs play for Hiarcs 7.00 on k6-3 400mhz. It finds Rc3 instantly >and after the reply Qd8, it replies to that Nxe6 instantly too. Or maybe I'm >not being fair trying it out on Hiarcs? >S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.