Author: blass uri
Date: 07:02:49 02/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 27, 2000 at 07:29:37, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On February 26, 2000 at 20:33:09, Bertil Eklund wrote: >>>what is the problem? >>>he lives in france. >>>i live in germany. >>>he is french. i am german. >>>he has bought a k6-3, i have bought a k6-3. >>>he has played a game and i played a game. >>>so what is your problem. shall i forbid HIM to post a game >>>AFTER i had played mine ???? >>>i was first, and later HE made a game in france. >>> >>No problem at all but I was a bit surprised when I checked your game in may >>database and found another with same players and computers. >> >>>did i posted the game or him ?? >>>you still did not answer who and when posted the game. >>>why not ? >>> >>Do you think that I should check every game played by xx if it had been played >>before, interrupt it and restart? > >if i would be the accurate-guy for the ssdf, i would collect all >games in cbf or pgn , put it into a database and search for doubles. >the machine is doing it itself. >would throw out the doubles and count again. > >if you have ONE guy in charge for collecting results and data, there >is no problem to do the accurate-job. > >since eric and i and other guys liking cstal and other programs are not >interested >in statistics or counting results the statistical way you do, we do of course >not coordinate or collect all cstal games in a master-pool and proof them >for doubles. >why should we ? >our intention is opposite to yours. we say: the game itself is important, >not the result. >so we discuss games, and do not have any statistical demand to fullfill. >if i would be you, means: if i would be ssdf, i would of course make >sure the data is in propper order. > >look, in the moment i do play out cstal vs. tiger. >it looks cstal kills tiger in a classical tal-attack. >how shall i post this without lots of people jumping on me like hell because >they do not believe what they do not want to believe. >but it happens. it would be much better when cstal would lose, >so tiger could make more points and cstal results would be taken more >seriously. but the program do not do me the favour. >shit. Is there something special about the book of tal? Usually I do not see so many kings attacks in games. Tal seems to have a king attack in most of your games in this tournament. Did tal learn something from previous games that you played with it(not in this tournament)? Maybe if you like to play a lot with tal then it can explain getting better results with tal because tal could learn more than the oppoents from previous games. This is only a theory and I have no idea if it is right. I do not know if you play with tal more than you play with other opponents. I believe you that you do not cheat in your games and play games in your tournament only once but the question is what happen before the games. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.