Author: Jeroen Noomen
Date: 07:56:10 02/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 27, 2000 at 07:03:53, stuart taylor wrote: Just seeing 1. Rc3 is not enough. Others find 1. Rc3 in less than 1 second as well, but the point is that they should see that 1. ... Qd8 is losing in that case. Hiarcs might find 1. Rc3 instantly, but it doesn't see that 1. ... Qd8 is losing. Because it cannot see such a deep combination in less than 1 second. So it might be better to ask the question 'After which time the program sees that 1. Rc3 is winning?' A score of at least +3 should be indicated. Try this one out and tell me when Hiarcs spots that White is winning. I'm sure this will take longer than The King's 8 seconds! Best regards, Jeroen >All this is childs play for Hiarcs 7.00 on k6-3 400mhz. It finds Rc3 instantly >and after the reply Qd8, it replies to that Nxe6 instantly too. Or maybe I'm >not being fair trying it out on Hiarcs? >S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.