Author: Chessfun
Date: 09:58:01 02/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 27, 2000 at 07:29:37, Thorsten Czub wrote: <snipped> > >look, in the moment i do play out cstal vs. tiger. >it looks cstal kills tiger in a classical tal-attack. I shall use this CSTal in my next tourney even if I have to manually play games. I want to see these classical tal-attacks that it sees before other programs. I will play these games on two identical Cel 433's each with 128 Mb ram, anything special I should use as settings as I have read other conflicting info on settings or do I just use default?. >how shall i post this without lots of people jumping on me like hell because >they do not believe what they do not want to believe. >but it happens. it would be much better when cstal would lose, >so tiger could make more points and cstal results would be taken more >seriously. but the program do not do me the favour. >shit. >i have to accept that cstal saw the king-attack much earlier than tiger. >my girl friend is my witness that i startet this game ONCE and have not done >any other game Then get her to post something stating you never pressed re-start or new game or whatever....or have her post the game .....I am sure we would all believe her ;-) >or pressed new game or whatever cheating some people >believe i would do. i started the game and when i saw the tal-attack coming, >i told her: oh - this will be problematic for me since people expect >tiger to win. Why has this tourney taken so long? seems maybe it should be called the late millennium tourney. When is it you expect to finish? Thanks
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.