Author: Jeremiah Penery
Date: 01:41:47 02/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 28, 2000 at 04:24:43, Shep wrote: >(PIII-500) > >New position >r3b1nr/ppqn1k1p/4p1p1/1P1pPpP1/1B1N1P1P/R7/3Q4/R3KB2 w Q - 0 1 > >Analysis by Deep Junior 6.0: > >1.b6 Qxb6 2.0-0-0 > µ (-1.34) depth: 3 00:00:00 >1.h5 Qb6 > ³ (-0.53) depth: 3 00:00:00 >1.Bd6 Qb6 2.0-0-0 > ³ (-0.40) depth: 3 00:00:00 >1.Rxa7 Rxa7 2.Rxa7 Qb6 3.Ra8 h6 4.Be2 hxg5 > ² (0.29) depth: 3 00:00:00 > = (0.15) depth: 9 00:00:00 29kN >1.Rc3 Qd8 2.Bd6 Rc8 3.Rxa7 Rxc3 4.Qxc3 Qb6 5.Ra8 Ne7 6.Qb4 Ng8 7.Nxe6 Qe3+ 8.Kd1 > ² (0.28) depth: 9 00:00:00 88kN > ² (0.57) depth: 15 00:00:16 5418kN It sees the move for the wrong reasons. After 1. ...Qd8, there should be a high + score for white (+3 or more). Since the score isn't even +1, IMO Junior hasn't solved it yet.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.