Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: What approach do you use to handle castling/en passant for repetition?

Author: Eugene Nalimov

Date: 13:28:58 02/28/00

Go up one level in this thread


On February 28, 2000 at 16:20:21, Tom Kerrigan wrote:

>On February 28, 2000 at 13:51:25, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>Who isn't including EP status in the hash signature?  I can't imagine _anyone_
>>not doing this.  It leads to simple failures that are easy to predict.
>
>I'm not sure the authors would appreciate it if I started talking about their
>algorithms in an open forum like this. I'm sure you understand.
>
>As for knowingly adding bugs--well, duh. I don't expect you to keep the damn
>"bug" IN. And you yourself said it would be easy to prove your point. So do it.
>
>-Tom

I believe Bob already did it - he said that he lost the game because of not
storing EP bit in hash signature. For me that means that at least for one
program hashing EP bit makes a difference.

For other program that can matter less, of course - e.g. if you don't use hashed
score from the previous moves, error chances are decreasing.

Eugene



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.