Author: Eugene Nalimov
Date: 13:28:58 02/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 28, 2000 at 16:20:21, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >On February 28, 2000 at 13:51:25, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>Who isn't including EP status in the hash signature? I can't imagine _anyone_ >>not doing this. It leads to simple failures that are easy to predict. > >I'm not sure the authors would appreciate it if I started talking about their >algorithms in an open forum like this. I'm sure you understand. > >As for knowingly adding bugs--well, duh. I don't expect you to keep the damn >"bug" IN. And you yourself said it would be easy to prove your point. So do it. > >-Tom I believe Bob already did it - he said that he lost the game because of not storing EP bit in hash signature. For me that means that at least for one program hashing EP bit makes a difference. For other program that can matter less, of course - e.g. if you don't use hashed score from the previous moves, error chances are decreasing. Eugene
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.