Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Has anyone Read Michael Adams Response to the Deep Jr. Fiasco?

Author: James Robertson

Date: 19:09:01 02/28/00

Go up one level in this thread


>
>>If anyone/someone should be ashamed of themself,it's should be the people who
>>make wild accusations without have both side of the story.
>
>What were the wild accusations to which you refer?  Most of those that I saw
>seemed to be based upon credible testimony of one or more eyewitesses to the
>actual events.

This quote of Amir's seems wild: "Adams may have missed here a golden
opportunity to demand being declared winner of the entire Grand Prix."

It seems that Mig told Adams Junior would be forfeited if it was not ready to
play by a certain time, and after that time Adams asked why the game was not
forfeited. Carol Jarecki then ruled in Adams' favor and forfeited Junior. Amir
then interpreted this to mean that Adam's had insisted on Junior being
forfeited, which does not seem to be the case. I am curious to hear Amir's
opinion on this.

James




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.