Author: blass uri
Date: 23:50:17 02/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 28, 2000 at 14:56:00, Chessfun wrote: >On February 28, 2000 at 08:17:45, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>On February 27, 2000 at 12:58:01, Chessfun wrote: >> >>>On February 27, 2000 at 07:29:37, Thorsten Czub wrote: >>>I shall use this CSTal in my next tourney even if I have >>>to manually play games. I want to see these classical tal-attacks >>>that it sees before other programs. I will play these games on >>>two identical Cel 433's each with 128 Mb ram, anything special >>>I should use as settings as I have read other conflicting info >>>on settings or do I just use default?. >> >>download cstal2.03 from oxford. >>thats all. >>play 40/120 tournament games. >I already have 2.03. Do you believe it will only >perform at 40/120 what about game/60 or 40'/40 + 40'/40 +40'. He believes that longer time control is always better for tal. You can play at 40'/40 + 40'/40 +40' but if you get bad results for tal then it is not an evidence not to trust thorsten's results. >>how long would you need in your spare time to play 70 x 40/120 games ?? >Not sure, but I wouldn't have played them all manually. >I can see playing CSTal v MCP8 manually, but F6 V J6 or >F6 V H732....not me, not when the interface is set-up to >handle such a case. Most of his games are not between chessbase programs. I also read that thorsten likes to watch the games live and look at the main lines of the programs because he gets more information by this method then by only looking at the games after they are played. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.