Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 04:55:30 02/29/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 28, 2000 at 14:56:00, Chessfun wrote: >Not an insult a joke. The point being that if people think >you are doing something in your games saying your "girlfriend" >is a witness is meaningless. how to show evidence ?? there is no way. therefore suggesting that someone cheats is throwing mud. >I have no reason to not trust. So for me it isn't a >question of trust till I see evidence saying otherwise. what is evidence ?! only a materialistic word used by people who like reductionism and cartesianism. >Not sure, but I wouldn't have played them all manually. what is the sense playing them automatically when the results do not reflect the playing strength but some bug or cheating-code in an autoplayer ? so - there is only one way... >I can see playing CSTal v MCP8 manually, but F6 V J6 or >F6 V H732....not me, not when the interface is set-up to >handle such a case. i do not believe that when you let ANY chessbase engine play against each other, no matter about the setting, that it is the same as on 2 machines. the playing strength measured on 1 pc is different than on 2. this has reasons that can be found within the chessbase user interface and within the programs. i do not trust those engine-engine matches on 1 pc. >Thanks.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.