Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 05:01:29 02/29/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 29, 2000 at 02:50:17, blass uri wrote: >He believes that longer time control is always better for tal. >You can play at 40'/40 + 40'/40 +40' but if you get bad results for tal then it >is not an evidence not to trust thorsten's results. the same counts for many slow-searchers, like hiarcs/the king ... when you play 60/60 instead of 40/120, they get 1/3 of the time, the fast-searchers outsearch them. with the minutes, the fast-searchers run against the search three explosion, so after 2 minutes they don't really come deeper, but cstal comes deeper. so playing 60/60 or even faster is better for fast-searchers, and playing longer time controls is better for slow searchers IMO. like for human beeings. they can also play much better against machines on slow time controls. >I also read that thorsten likes to watch the games live and look at the main >lines of the programs because he gets more information by this method then by >only looking at the games after they are played. right. to find misevaluations or wrong behaviour. >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.