Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Has anyone Read Michael Adams Response to the Deep Jr. Fiasco?

Author: Michael J Fitch

Date: 05:59:29 02/29/00

Go up one level in this thread


On February 28, 2000 at 21:41:59, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On February 28, 2000 at 21:32:20, Michael J Fitch wrote:
>
>>On February 28, 2000 at 20:25:29, Derrick Williams wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>  At the this week in chess site, a letter is displayed by michael Adams
>>>explaining the circumstances surounding the Deep blue Scandal, It appears that
>>>Michael Adams is attempting to shift the blame away from himself, on to the
>>>victims, which was Clearly Amir Ban and his partner Shay.  I believe this only
>>>adds insult to injury, Mr. Adams ought to be ashamed of himself.
>>
>>
>>
>>I think you should read this letter again because if he blames anyone for the
>>mistakes/problems,it's mig. I don't even thing you could call it blaming someone
>>as more or less just telling his side of events/story.
>What interview did you read?  Here are some quotes from the one that I read:
>
>"I was however quite shocked to read the unwarranted accusations by Shay
>Bushinsky and Amir Ban."
>"Indeed whilst this match did nothing to change my high opinion of Deep Junior,
>unfortunately I am unable to say the same about its programmers and operators."

The only thing mickey is blaming them on is coming to CCC and saying all kinds
of crap/onesided whinning.Do i think that Deep Junior getting forfeit was
fair,NO i don't.Should there have been rules set up for internet connection
problems,YES.((( Mig ))) made the decision,that if DJ was not ready in 15
minutes time that it would be forfeited.I REITERATE ((( MIG MADE THIS DECISION
NOT MIKEY )))CASE CLOSED.

>"It is also surprising to me that as much has been made of the importance of the
>match to Deep Junior that it's operators did not ensure that the venue at which
>it played had either a very reliable internet connection and or backup
>connections and other facilities available."

Common sense should have prevailed.

>"I feel after the problem Mig behaved very decently by

> accepting much of the blame

  ( little snip )

MIG ACCEPTS MOST(HE SHOULD ACCEPT ALL THE BLAME,ALONG WITH EVERYONE AT CLUB
KASPAROV) OF THE BLAME.
Instead of blaming Mikey for accepting what Mig offered(forfeit after 15
minutes),you should be blaming Mig for making this offer,MAKE SENSE DOESN'T IT?

>"Clearly however in the early stages it will be necessary for all sides to be
>understanding to deal with any teething troubles and I find it a great shame
>that the Deep Junior team has been unable to do this."

Very good point don't you think ?
>
>Not the same one as I did, apparently.
>
>>If anyone/someone should be ashamed of themself,it's should be the people who
>>make wild accusations without have both side of the story.
>
>What were the wild accusations to which you refer?  Most of those that I saw
>seemed to be based upon credible testimony of one or more eyewitesses to the
>actual events.

There were many posters who wrote all kinds of wild theory's about what was
going on,maybe you were not paying attention to these post and reply's.GO back
and reread everyone blaming Mikey for everything,then you will understand him
trying to tell his side of this story.

PS: For all the ANAL RETENTIVE members here in CCC.Turn your puter off ,go
outside,walk around in the grass bare-footed,look up at the sky and take a big
collective breath.IT'S ALL GOOD  :-)))



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.