Author: Peter McKenzie
Date: 10:46:11 02/29/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 29, 2000 at 13:14:10, Tony Hedlund wrote: >On February 29, 2000 at 12:57:51, Christophe Theron wrote: > >>On February 29, 2000 at 04:59:19, Tony Hedlund wrote: >> >>>On February 28, 2000 at 04:01:11, Jouni Uski wrote: >>> >>>>I have tested above mentioned programs in my AMD K6-2/450 Mhz. And I have >>>>noticed one interesting thing: In 5s blitz games Lg2000 always wins matches, >>>>but when I give programs more time e.g. 40/40 crafty starts to egual or win. >>>>So probably 1 minute/move gives it enough time to avoid tactical blunders, and >>>>it's positional and specially endgame play is superior to Lg2000. It would be >>>>very interesting to see SSDF test Crafty in 40/2 games - it's probably not >>>>much from commercial ones! >>>> >>>>Jouni >>> >>>We ARE testing Crafty. Version 17.0X. There are 40 games in my new bases at my >>>URL: http://home.interact.se/~w100107/welcome.htm >>> >>>And I have 40 games at home waiting for the next upload. >>> >>>Tony >> >> >>Very good. Did Bob agree with your all your settings? It would be sad to hear >>that the optimal settings, or the right book, were not used. > >I'm sorry to make you sad Christophe, but we are testing the Chessbase engine >with the general.ctg book. To test the REAL Crafty we need a unix-machine, Bob's >big book and testing manually since Crafty don't support auto232. I recall that someone wrote an auto232 driver for winboard, perhaps you might want to look into using that? > >Tony > >> >> >> Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.