Author: Djordje Vidanovic
Date: 16:46:30 02/29/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 29, 2000 at 01:29:19, James Robertson wrote: >On February 29, 2000 at 01:23:04, Jouni Uski wrote: > >>On February 28, 2000 at 18:38:23, James Robertson wrote: >> >>>On February 28, 2000 at 04:01:11, Jouni Uski wrote: >>> >>>>I have tested above mentioned programs in my AMD K6-2/450 Mhz. And I have >>>>noticed one interesting thing: In 5s blitz games Lg2000 always wins matches, >>>>but when I give programs more time e.g. 40/40 crafty starts to egual or win. >>>>So probably 1 minute/move gives it enough time to avoid tactical blunders, and >>>>it's positional and specially endgame play is superior to Lg2000. It would be >>>>very interesting to see SSDF test Crafty in 40/2 games - it's probably not >>>>much from commercial ones! >>>> >>>>Jouni >>> >>>In my testing (say in a RR tournament) Crafty has always had a large lead above >>>LG at all time controls (bullet on up), and that against every version of LG.... >>> >>>James >> >>Are You running in Celeron? I have noticed, that Crafty runs 40 % faster in >>Celeron than in same frequency AMD! >> >>Jouni > >Actually, it's an Intel. :) BTW, Insomniac loses worse to LG than Crafty. > >James What do you mean here: a. Insomniac loses worse to LG than it does to Crafty, or b. Insomniac loses worse to LG than Crafty does? :-)) *** Djordje
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.