Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Has anyone Read Michael Adams Response to the Deep Jr. Fiasco?

Author: James Robertson

Date: 17:21:20 02/29/00

Go up one level in this thread


On February 29, 2000 at 14:45:00, KarinsDad wrote:

>On February 28, 2000 at 22:09:01, James Robertson wrote:
>
>>>
>>>>If anyone/someone should be ashamed of themself,it's should be the people who
>>>>make wild accusations without have both side of the story.
>>>
>>>What were the wild accusations to which you refer?  Most of those that I saw
>>>seemed to be based upon credible testimony of one or more eyewitesses to the
>>>actual events.
>>
>>This quote of Amir's seems wild: "Adams may have missed here a golden
>>opportunity to demand being declared winner of the entire Grand Prix."
>
>It may be wild, but I think it is factual. I recall reading it here several
>weeks back and thinking, hmmmm.
>
>Now, someone can correct me if I am wrong (I do not have time at the moment to
>look through the archives), but when I read Adams' statement, it seemed that he
>was being fairly factual about the quotes he made.
>
>KarinsDad :)

I think that the problem is (like it was during the game) communication. It is
an unfortunate way to finish an event like this, to say the least.

James



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.