Author: Tony Hedlund
Date: 23:20:18 02/29/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 29, 2000 at 13:46:11, Peter McKenzie wrote: >On February 29, 2000 at 13:14:10, Tony Hedlund wrote: > >>On February 29, 2000 at 12:57:51, Christophe Theron wrote: >> >>>On February 29, 2000 at 04:59:19, Tony Hedlund wrote: >>> >>>>On February 28, 2000 at 04:01:11, Jouni Uski wrote: >>>> >>>>>I have tested above mentioned programs in my AMD K6-2/450 Mhz. And I have >>>>>noticed one interesting thing: In 5s blitz games Lg2000 always wins matches, >>>>>but when I give programs more time e.g. 40/40 crafty starts to egual or win. >>>>>So probably 1 minute/move gives it enough time to avoid tactical blunders, and >>>>>it's positional and specially endgame play is superior to Lg2000. It would be >>>>>very interesting to see SSDF test Crafty in 40/2 games - it's probably not >>>>>much from commercial ones! >>>>> >>>>>Jouni >>>> >>>>We ARE testing Crafty. Version 17.0X. There are 40 games in my new bases at my >>>>URL: http://home.interact.se/~w100107/welcome.htm >>>> >>>>And I have 40 games at home waiting for the next upload. >>>> >>>>Tony >>> >>> >>>Very good. Did Bob agree with your all your settings? It would be sad to hear >>>that the optimal settings, or the right book, were not used. >> >>I'm sorry to make you sad Christophe, but we are testing the Chessbase engine >>with the general.ctg book. To test the REAL Crafty we need a unix-machine, Bob's >>big book and testing manually since Crafty don't support auto232. > >I recall that someone wrote an auto232 driver for winboard, perhaps you might >want to look into using that? I tried something like that once, but I couldn't make it work. Tony >>Tony >> >>> >>> >>> Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.