Author: blass uri
Date: 07:12:06 03/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 01, 2000 at 09:36:41, Jeroen van Dorp wrote: >Hi fellow CCC-ers > >I played a blitz game on FICS and came in this lost position. >Analyzing afterwards supported by Fritz I found out Fritz gave the following >evaluation: > >OhWellOkay - Jeroen >[D]3R4/p7/1pb1k3/4r2p/4p1p1/2P3P1/PP3P1P/4R1K1 b - - 0 42 > >Analysis by Fritz 6: > >1. = (0.00): 42...Kf5 >2. +- (2.22): 42...Bd5 43.b3 Ke7 44.Rh8 Bf7 45.Rh6 Kf8 46.Rd6 Rd5 47.Rxd5 >3. +- (2.25): 42...a5 43.Red1 Ke7 >4. +- (2.41): 42...Ke7 43.Rc8 Kd7 44.Rh8 Rd5 45.Rh7+ Kc8 46.Rxa7 Rd2 47.b3 > >Of course after playing Kf5, which I actually did, the assessment is > >OhWellOkay - Jeroen >3R4/p7/1pb5/4rk1p/4p1p1/2P3P1/PP3P1P/4R1K1 w - - 0 42 > >Analysis by Fritz 6: > >1. +- (2.31): 43.Red1 Re6 44.Rh8 Kg6 45.h3 gxh3 >2. +- (2.16): 43.h3 gxh3 44.Kh2 Rb5 45.b4 Kg4 46.Rg8+ Kf3 47.Rf8+ Kg4 >3. +- (2.16): 43.h4 gxh3 >4. +- (2.16): 43.Kf1 a6 44.Rf8+ Kg6 45.Rb8 Re6 46.c4 Ba4 47.b3 Bd7 > > >Why does Fritz give the 0.00 evaluation without a further suggested line and >switches to normal evaluation after playing 42...Kf5? >Any ideas, or is this old stuff? Maybe Kf5 leads to repetition of the position and Fritz assumes that repetition is a draw. I cannot know if I do not have all the game. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.