Author: Howard Exner
Date: 10:02:53 03/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 01, 2000 at 04:18:56, stuart taylor wrote: >On March 01, 2000 at 01:08:12, Howard Exner wrote: > >>On February 29, 2000 at 21:51:33, stuart taylor wrote: >> >>>After careful examination, it has become clear that Rxb7 has nothing in it >>>except for some interesting complications nearby, good for a draw. >>> Hiarcs doesn't choose this move even after a long time simply because >>>there is nothing in it in the long term. If there was, then Hiarcs is normally >>>one of the first. >> >>About how long did you let Hiarcs analyse this position? >> >>If you input the move Rxb7, how does Hiarcs proceed? >> >>> So it is wishful thinking to analize a position by seeing how long it takes a >>>program to "find" what you fancy it to find. >>>S.Taylor > >Eventually I inserted Rxb7 on hiarcs 7.0 and after a good few hours it >acknowledged black as -88, but that seemed only to be due to the potential >but not actual danger black was in. He COULD have fallen into one or two >traps due to the bad position of his king-with possible mating nets. > Then I eventually pruned out the continuation with help of monitor x 3 >and there were no lines at all which led to anything. i.e. anything which >might possibly have led to anything I examined quite deeply until it was more >than obvious that there was not. > It's a very perfect method of analysis done in the right way and not leaving >any stone >unturned. >S.Taylor What is Hiarcs main line? Below is an analysis link of Kasparov for this game. He examines the replys Qc4, which is the game continuation, as well as Rhe8 and Ne4. All are leading to white wins according to GK and many lines are quite intricate and deep. Does your method using Hiarcs refute any of these? http://www.kasparovchess.com/serve/templates/folders/show.asp?p_docID=1463&p_docLang=EN
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.