Author: Martin
Date: 09:45:41 03/02/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 02, 2000 at 12:16:12, KarinsDad wrote: >On March 02, 2000 at 11:55:11, Martin wrote: > >[snip] >> >>Yep, this is clearly won. But in the 2.c4 variation I'm not sure anymore (have >>posted my doubts in the answer to Howard's post below). >> >>Martin > >Don't be so sure. See my other post. Maybe. maybe not. :) Hmmm. > >KarinsDad :) > >PS. The problem with ALL of this is that we are going so many ply deep and >making certain assumptions along the way. One move different could flip the game >into the win or the draw category. But it definitely hasn't been proven yet for >all main variations. A mathematical proof would be too long and therefore too erraneous, I agree. And if you mean that even Gary can miss a defense/attack idea then you're certainly right too. But ( :)there's always a "but", huh?) looking at a position long enough, we finally get the gist of it (hopefully; and Kasparov gets it much earlier...). Okay, okay, there is a chance that at the end we are wrong anyway but hey, in this position I have the feeling that humans understand it by far better than any program. Boy, this feels *really* good... ;) Martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.