Author: Vincent Vega
Date: 23:56:27 03/02/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 03, 2000 at 01:43:50, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >On March 02, 2000 at 03:17:25, JW de Kort wrote: > >>Hello chess friends, >> >>a few eeks ago i asked a question about MFC. After a few weeks of studie i still >>do not understand how to use MFC so i decided this is to difficult for me. Still > >Yeah, I gave up on MFC a long time ago. > >In my opinion, I think it's silly, and there is no reason to use it. Many >thousands of programmers get along just fine using Win32 API calls. > >-Tom MFC is far from perfect (or even good) but there are reasons to use it. It encourages the use of OOP which is a superior programming method to procedural programming (easier to make changes, better reusability, more elegant, much better for GUIs, used in modern languages like Java, see "Software Performance Reviews" for the studies showing OOP’s superiority). If nothing else, MFC's message delegation alone makes it worth using.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.