Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Interesting sacrifice from correspondence game

Author: Ed Schröder

Date: 09:02:53 03/03/00

Go up one level in this thread


On March 03, 2000 at 06:33:59, Steve Lim wrote:

>On March 03, 2000 at 00:20:35, Jeremiah Penery wrote:
>
>>On March 03, 2000 at 00:19:03, Jeremiah Penery wrote:
>>
>>>On March 02, 2000 at 19:12:55, Pete Galati wrote:
>>>
>>>>On March 02, 2000 at 10:11:50, Shep wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Critical position:
>>>>>[D]r1b2rk1/1pq2pbp/p2pp1p1/4n3/2P1PBn1/2N5/PPBNQPPP/R2R2K1 b - - 0 14; bm Nxf2;
>>>>>id Shep 2000.01
>>>>>
>>>>>14...Nxf2!!
>>>>>
>>>>>The results from the programs I tested (PIII-550):
>>>>>
>>>>>Junior 6.0:       0:55, +0,35
>>>>>Deep Junior 6.0a: 0:59, +0,32
>>>>>Nimzo 7.32:       6:00, +0,40
>>>>>Hiarcs 7.32:      8:19, +0,06
>>>>>Fritz 6.0a:     >10:00
>>>>>
>>>>>---
>>>>>Shep
>>>>
>>>>Keep in mind this is on my slow 90mhz machine, but I could not get Crafty to
>>>>find Nxf2 in analyze mode, so I fed it the move and annotated the game (cut
>>>>short at 14. ...Nxf2) and also below is the game log.
>>>
>>>On that machine, Crafty will probably take about 30 minutes to find Nxf2.  At
>>>least 15 minutes, anyway.  I saw that you only searched it for one minute - of
>>>course this will not be long enough.  Even on the PIII-550, J6 barely found it
>>>in under a minute.
>>
>>I missed something. You let it search for 15 minutes, but were only at depth 10.
>> Crafty takes to around ply 13-14 to find this.
>
>I asked Bob (hyatt) to check this out, apparently it doesn't like Nxf2 even at
>ply 15 on the xeons.
>
>Steve.

I am not conviced Nxf2 is the best move in this position.

Ed



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.