Author: José Antônio Fabiano Mendes
Date: 07:11:34 03/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On March 16, 2000 at 09:53:31, Boris Burrakowski wrote: >Hi! > >Be2 isn't the best move in the position. I've let Fritz crunch >numbers for some 3 hours and this is what it came up with: > > >r1r3k1/pp2qppp/4pn2/n2p2B1/3P2N1/2P1P2P/P4PP1/1BRQ1bK1 b - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Fritz 6: > >1. -+ (-2.84): 1...Ba6 2.e4 dxe4 3.Bxe4 Kf8 4.Bxh7 Qd8 5.Bb1 Nc4 6.Qf3 >2. -+ (-2.75): 1...Bb5 2.Nxf6+ gxf6 3.Qc2 Kf8 4.Qxh7 Ke8 5.Qh8+ Kd7 6.Qxf6 >3. -+ (-2.75): 1...Bc4 2.Qc2 Kf8 3.Nxf6 gxf6 4.Qxh7 Ke8 5.Qh8+ Qf8 6.Qxf8+ >4. -+ (-2.72): 1...Qa3 2.Nxf6+ gxf6 3.Bxf6 Bc4 4.Bxh7+ Kf8 5.Rc2 Ke8 6.Qg4 >5. -+ (-2.19): 1...Be2 2.Qxe2 Qa3 3.Qe1 Nxg4 4.hxg4 Nc4 5.Qd1 > >My suspicion was aroused when I saw the point Qa3, and wondered: why not >immediately. As the output shows Qa3 is also winning, as well as any bishop >retreat except for Bd3. Since this is a tactical sacrifice from blacks side >I'm positive Fritz has found the correct approach. The conclusion is: The >sacrifice was losing. > >Have a nice day! I´m just a measly 1600 player,who am I to disagree with Fritz? [Well done!,thank you] JAFM 16...Qf8,what a blunder!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.