Author: blass uri
Date: 00:02:09 04/13/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 12, 2000 at 23:29:54, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On April 12, 2000 at 17:46:51, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On April 12, 2000 at 17:32:44, Derrick Williams wrote: >> >>>On April 12, 2000 at 16:48:15, Dann Corbit wrote: >>> >>>>On April 12, 2000 at 16:36:09, Derrick Williams wrote: >>>> >>>>>I would like to simulate the expierence of playing against Deepblue. How long >>>>>would I have to let fritz6 think per move on a pent 450 to simulate playing >>>>>deepblue at 40/2 hrs? Should I let fritz6 think one hour per move or what? >>>> >>>>Does fritz6 have a 40 moves / 2000 hrs setting? >>>>That should be about right, as far as NPS. >>> >>> >>> You are exaggerating just a bit aren't you? >> >>No. >>DB calculates 200M NPS, micros about 200K NPS. (roughly speaking -- might be >>off by a factor of 2 or so for what fritz 6 can do on a PIII 450, which would >>reduce it to 1000 hours instead of 2000). >> >>DB was one heck of a machine. > > >Yes.... and it could peak at 1B nodes per second, with 200M being the typical >lower bound... 480 chess processors at 2 to 2.4M nodes per second each... 480 chess processors at 2 to 2.4M nodes can be the same as 200M with one processor if you consider loss of speed from parallel search. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.