Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 01:50:54 10/17/97
Go up one level in this thread
On October 17, 1997 at 03:59:32, Ed Schröder wrote: >What I noticed is that on a simple P90 Rebel9 wins games on ply depth >because of the new faster search. For Rebel this is a surprising new >development wouldn't you say so? Yes, I do. >Then on faster >machines the opponent program sees more and therefore is able to avoid >mistakes better resulting in a better score. Something we discussed earlier: tactics vanish when programs can go deep enough (and you know that so well). It used to be in favour of Rebel... Times are changing... >I currently am running an AUTO232 session (against R8,G3,G5,M6,H6) on >1 minute average. Results are also good sofar. Then I plan 0:30 average >and so on just to satisfy my curiosity. Please tell us about the results. I swear I'll never say it's commercial announcement. :) Can you give us an idea of the average ply depth Rebel9 reaches in those games, if it is not "top secret"? I begin to be glad not to see Rebel in Paris this year, because if Rebel is good ALSO in fast chess, I'd better go back to tic-tac-toe (I wrote a very strong TTT program, you know) :) But I hope to see you, because I'm one of your fans! - Christophe -
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.