Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Missing Simple Tactics

Author: Daniel Clausen

Date: 13:42:16 05/02/00

Go up one level in this thread


Hi

On May 02, 2000 at 07:38:08, Ed Schröder wrote:

>On May 02, 2000 at 06:26:34, Michael Neish wrote:
>
>>In the position below White wins material by the blindingly obvious Bg5.
>>
>>[D]6k1/pp1nrppp/5rb1/P2P4/5BP1/5P2/4BK1P/R3R3 b - -

>Rebel gives a bonus of 1.00 in eval for Bg5 assuming one of those rooks
>get lost. A higher bonus is quite risky as the opponent often has an
>escape. The effect in search is minor. It was effective in the days of
>programs running at 5 Mhz hiting 5-6 plies only. Nowadays I would not
>spend time on such (processor) time consuming cases.

Still sounds like an interesting idea to me. Maybe it can be used for
move-ordering. Depending how easy it is for a specific engine to detect
such cases it might help a lil, but then, only experiments can answer
this. (It's on my ever-growing todo-list :)

Kind regards,
 -sargon



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.