Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Chessfun and Nunn1 Tests

Author: Chessfun

Date: 14:35:46 05/05/00

Go up one level in this thread


On May 05, 2000 at 14:01:49, Georg v. Zimmermann wrote:

>On May 05, 2000 at 09:35:19, Mogens Larsen wrote:
>
>>On May 05, 2000 at 07:03:40, Georg v. Zimmermann wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>>It is true when posting I use one of the computers.
>>>
>>>!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!
>>
>>I don't think it's that important, unless at a very short timecontrol. It
>>depends on the mail software used I would imagine. Outlook or Outlook Express
>>might not be a good idea. Hard to evaluate the influence correctly IMO.
>
>It is very important IMHO :
>
>1.) These programs differ very little in playing strength. You need exact
>results under fair conditions with many games, else you can't tell which is
>stronger.


According to others since this test don't tell which is stonger
anyway it don't matter. OTOH You need fair conditions, posting
at message at CCC IMHO has no effect.


>2.) If you load a program like IE and Outlook , during the time it loads the
>program HD-access will basically stop the search. But the clock of the program
>will keep ticking. If it uses approx. 1 min for one move (not a very short time
>control) and its a critical position and it only gets 20 seconds effective
>thinking time ...


Outlook for what? posting at CCC?.
And if you post such a  note as 2.) then maybe you should have checked
with something like taskinfo2000 as I have then you would see the result
was next to nothing and could have saved yourself the trouble of posting !!.

Thanks.


>
>Sincerely,
>Georg



This page took 0.03 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.