Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 01:50:32 05/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 09, 2000 at 04:16:18, blass uri wrote: >I disagree. >You will find always strong humans to play computer if they get enough money. Yes, but I doubt that this will include tournament play. A single game now and then is uninteresting, unless you're consumed by a passion for computer chess. >You can also give more rights to humans instead of restricting computer engines. This makes it even more confusing, special and uninteresting IMO. >I think that if the situation will be that it is clear that humans have no >chance without books then books can be allowed in games against computer. Then they'll have to extend the timecontrols to allow the player some time to search through his books. I think this is a stupid idea. >It is not the case and the Israeli league proved that even 2177 player has >chances to draw against computer(he drew 3 computers and did not lose games >against computer program in the israeli league) No, that's true, but we're talking about the present _and_ the future. >There is no reason to do it. >I think that you are almost the only human in the world who are interested in >teaching programs in the same way that humans learn. No, I'm quite sure that I'm not the only one, but I don't mind being special if that would be the case. >Other people are only interested in teaching programs to play better moves. Making a program learn from its mistakes is also tutoring. Teaching: to cause to learn by example or _experience_. >Humans also learn from the experience of others and not only from the experience >of themselves so giving the program to learn only from the games that it played >is not similiar to what GM's do. No problem, if the concept is put into system, then there's nothing wrong with exchanging information as long as it comes from actual computer play. Sincerely, Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.