Author: blass uri
Date: 02:58:51 05/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 09, 2000 at 04:50:32, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On May 09, 2000 at 04:16:18, blass uri wrote: > >>I disagree. >>You will find always strong humans to play computer if they get enough money. > >Yes, but I doubt that this will include tournament play. A single game now and >then is uninteresting, unless you're consumed by a passion for computer chess. I think it is only a question of money. > >>You can also give more rights to humans instead of restricting computer engines. > >This makes it even more confusing, special and uninteresting IMO. I disagree. > >>I think that if the situation will be that it is clear that humans have no >>chance without books then books can be allowed in games against computer. > >Then they'll have to extend the timecontrols to allow the player some time to >search through his books. I think this is a stupid idea. I disagree. >>Other people are only interested in teaching programs to play better moves. > >Making a program learn from its mistakes is also tutoring. Teaching: to cause to >learn by example or _experience_. Making a program to learn from its mistkes can be productive in the middle game when tablebases cannot help. I do not think there is a need to do it in the opening when there is a database and in simple endgames when there are tablebases. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.